Enter your business outcomes and the initiatives you're considering. PrioriFlow gives you a prioritised pipeline of the highest-value change, suggests the delivery sequence, and builds the steerco pack. Simple to use. Serious underneath.
The sandbox is pre-loaded with an example insurer's portfolio; the method works for any organisation. Nothing you click affects real work, and there's nothing to install. Sits above Jira and Azure DevOps, answering "are we funding the right things?" before a single ticket exists.
Most change portfolios are ranked in a spreadsheet with scores nobody can explain, in a meeting the loudest voice wins. Then someone spends Friday retyping it into slides.
“The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do.”
A change portfolio has three jobs:
A vision and a few business objectives, each with a weight and a number to move. Everything else is measured against them.
In PrioriFlow: StrategyLeaders weight the objectives together, pair by pair. Every initiative links to the objective it moves, so each team can see what its work is for.
In PrioriFlow: weighting survey · Roll-UpEvery quarter, rank against the skills, cash and dependencies you actually have. What doesn't make the plan stays in plain sight, with the reason it was left out.
In PrioriFlow: Quarterly Plan · steerco packThe direction stays steady. Objectives are met and renewed. The plan changes every quarter.
Initiatives get ranked before the objectives behind them are measurable, weighted or agreed — so no score survives a challenge, whatever tool it sits in: a spreadsheet, a PPM suite or an AI copilot. PrioriFlow puts the steps back in order, every quarter, starting with the one nobody can skip.
Sized, skilled, costed, owned — living in one place, not four spreadsheets that disagree with each other by Friday. This is the part no tool can do for you — but PrioriFlow won't let a bad record hide in a quarter's numbers either:
Business objectives set and shaped before they're weighted — measuring the outcome itself, not a stand-in for it.
StrategyThemes and objectives, weighted by leadership — not one person's opinion.
StrategyEvery initiative in the pipeline, sized and skilled — not just the loud ones, or the ones someone remembered.
PipelineValue scored against objectives; feasibility gated separately — so "should we" and "can we" never get confused.
PipelineOne ranked list, arithmetically checkable, mandatory work kept apart from the fight for funding.
Prioritised ViewPrioriFlow suggests the plan for every quarter, fitted to real skill capacity, budget and dependencies — including into other portfolios. You decide what to apply.
Quarterly PlanThe steerco pack and dashboard close the loop on the evidence above, for the room that has to sign off on it.
Roll-Up DashboardThe direction stays steady. Objectives are met and renewed, and re-weighted when they are (steps 01 and 02). The plan changes every quarter: the sequence re-runs from step 03, on the same data. That's the governance model: the same rhythm every quarter, and on the Roll-Up, Govern runs as Strategy → Plan → Fund → Resource → Decide.
Four steps — from strategy to a defensible decision. Each step produces evidence; the decisions collect at the end, each one tracing back to the step that raised it.
Prioritisation only holds if it survives a challenge from the sharpest person in the room, so every number can answer for itself. We chose AHP for the same reason — it's the method a regulator already recognises. Defensible, not novel.
Instead of "rate this 1–10," a question everyone answers differently, AHP asks one pair at a time: is A more important than B? Stakeholders answer independently; PrioriFlow combines the results and checks they hold together. The weights carry the room's authority, not one person's opinion: aggregated by geometric mean, with the consistency ratio shown and the questions where leadership disagrees most called out.
| Combined Ratio | GWP | Zero Crit. Findings | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined Ratio | 1 | 1.50 | 0.67 |
| GWP +15% | 0.67 | 1 | 0.50 |
| Zero Crit. Findings | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1 |
Owners rate one objective at a time, against plain-language anchors ("enables new analytics" vs "deploys production ML for underwriting"), never a bare number with no shared meaning. The rank re-orders live as each rating lands, so the shape of the portfolio forms as you go. Score = the sum of objective weight × owner rating: the contribution matrix shows every cell, and the row sums to the score, so any rank is checkable live in a meeting.
One click proposes the plan for every quarter: the order that brings the most value within your capacity, skills and budget, with dependencies respected and mandatory work placed first. It lists exactly what it would move and why — keep anything where it is, and nothing changes until you apply it.
Mandatory work is funded first, kept separate from the ranked list. Work still awaiting a verdict stays visibly parked, never silently demoted, and only feasible or conditional work is ranked, so a rank always means "beats on value". The uncovered-weight check flags objectives with no credible initiative behind them, before you plan a quarter rather than after a board asks. The roll-up reads as one case, closing on exactly the decisions the evidence raised — each one ready to export with its evidence attached. Once a quarter's assigned, push it straight to Jira as Epics — one click, no re-typing, no separate integration platform to buy or configure.
The best way to see the method is to use it: try it in the sandbox, pre-loaded with example data.
Six real screens from the same sandbox, in the order you use them — strategy, pipeline, prioritisation, the quarterly plan, the roll-up, and the systems the plan touches. The example is an insurer; the method isn't.
Sandbox mode · example data for learning — nothing you do here affects real work. Open it and explore before you ever touch a live workspace.
One click renders the whole case to an A4 pack that tells the story in order: our strategy, how we're meeting it, the plan in time, the money, and a decision docket, each decision with its evidence and the call your team already made, ready to defend. Scores frozen at generation, method note in the appendix. What's gone is the Friday-night slide assembly and numbers that don't agree with each other — not the judgement. That part's still yours.
No jargon, no hand-waving — here's exactly what happens with your information.
Everything you enter (your strategy, initiatives, and scores) is stored on servers in Frankfurt, Germany, and separated from every other organisation by row-level security in the database itself. Nobody else can ever see your information, by design, not just by promise.
EU hosting · your data, walled offPrioriFlow only holds your portfolio — themes, objectives, initiatives, scores, capacity. It never touches your actual customers' or policyholders' information: no claims, no policies, nothing beyond your own team's name and email.
your portfolio only — never your customers'PrioriFlow itself isn't SOC 2 certified yet — we're in early access, pre-revenue, and honest about that. Our infrastructure is: we run on Supabase (database) and Vercel (hosting), both independently audited to SOC 2 Type II, the same kind of check banks and larger software vendors go through. Vercel is also ISO 27001 certified. The unglamorous, critical parts are handled by specialists, not improvised. Your data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and every change to a plan is logged with who made it and when.
SOC 2 Type II · ISO 27001 (Vercel)Everything you need is in the app, including a step-by-step guide. You decide when it's ready for real work.
Pre-loaded with example data, with a built-in guide for every step. Nothing to install, nothing to approve.
Fill in the form below. We review every request and reply by email within two working days.
Import your initiatives from Excel, set your objectives and follow the guide. Questions and feedback reach us from inside the app.
The full product on your own portfolio, free while we're in early access, and a direct line to the people building it, in writing and at your pace.
Run at least one real planning cycle through it: your objectives, your initiatives, your plan. Anonymised is fine.
Use the feedback button whenever something is confusing, wrong or missing. A line is enough.
Three questions by email after your first month, answered whenever suits you.
Tell us a little about your portfolio. We reply by email within two working days. Sign up to the app with the same email, so we can match your request.
No calls, no sales pitch. Everything happens in the app and by email. Prefer to talk it through? Say so in your request.
Built for portfolios like yours — 20–100 initiatives, quarterly or PI planning, a steerco to answer to, with mandatory regulatory work treated as a first-class concept, not a workaround.
Not ready to ask yet? The sandbox is pre-loaded with example data, nothing you touch affects real work, and there's nothing to install or approve first.
Just open the sandbox →Your data stays yours: a private workspace, export any time, deleted on request. Hosted in the EU (Frankfurt).
What we collect: account details (name, email), your organisation and workspace membership, the strategy/portfolio content you enter to use the Service, and, if you request early access, the details you give in the form. We don't collect special-category data (health, biometric, etc.), and PrioriFlow isn't intended for use by children.
Why: to provide the Service, keep it secure, and respond to support requests. We do not use your data for advertising, we don't sell it, and the Service sets no tracking cookies. During early access we look only at aggregate usage figures, to see what's working. Early access requests are kept for 12 months after our last contact with you.
This website: counts visits with Vercel Web Analytics, to see which pages are read, and counts downloads of the free template (the date, the page and the site you came from). It sets no cookies, stores nothing on your device and doesn't identify you.
Who sees it: our data processors, each under a data processing agreement: Supabase (database and sign-in), Vercel (hosting; its server functions run in the EU), Resend (feedback emails) and Formspree (the early access request form on this site). Plus other members of your own organisation and workspace, exactly as your admins configure access. Nobody outside that.
Where it lives: stored in the EU (Frankfurt, Germany). Vercel, Resend and Formspree are US companies, covered by their data processing agreements and the UK's transfer safeguards.
Your rights: under UK GDPR, you can access, correct, export, or erase your personal data, and complain to the ICO (ico.org.uk) if you're unhappy with how we've handled it. From inside the app: Account → Download My Data or Account → Delete My Account, any time, self-service.
Questions: hello@prioriflow.co.uk.
These terms govern your use of PrioriFlow ("the Service"), a portfolio prioritisation and planning tool, during early access. By creating an account or using the Service you agree to them on behalf of yourself and the organisation you use it for. If your organisation has a signed pilot or service agreement with us, that agreement takes precedence where the two differ. Our Privacy Policy explains how we handle personal data and forms part of these terms.
The Service is provided in early access: features are still being developed, may change or be withdrawn, and may occasionally be unavailable. During early access the Service is free of charge, unless your organisation has agreed other terms with us. We will tell your organisation's admins before early access ends or before any charges apply.
You must not:
We may suspend access that breaches this section or puts the Service or other users at risk, and will tell your organisation's admins when we do.
If a workspace admin connects a third-party service such as Jira, data the admin chooses to send is sent to that service under your organisation's own agreement with its provider. We are not responsible for third-party services.
The Service calculates scores, rankings, sequences, capacity checks and other recommendations from the data and weights your organisation enters. These are aids to decision-making. Your organisation remains responsible for its own decisions, including investment, resourcing and regulatory commitments, and for checking that results are suitable before relying on them.
If you send us ideas or feedback, we may use them to improve the Service without any obligation to you.
We own the Service, its software and its design. These terms give you a right to use it during early access; they do not transfer any ownership.
We may update these terms as the Service develops. We will update the version and date above and tell active users about material changes before they take effect. Continuing to use the Service after that means you accept the updated terms.
These terms are governed by the law of England and Wales, and the courts of England and Wales have exclusive jurisdiction.